In our time, we
tend to be perplexed. Today, there is a surfeit of information about the ways
of the world. So, we have to choose reliable information by ourselves. We
usually use the internet, television and radio to get information. SNS is
growing quickly. For instance, Twitter and Facebook are very popular. Journalism,
what the reporting by media in general is called, is a way of getting reliable
information for us. Now, confidence in journalism has declined in Japan. After the
big earthquake came in 2011, Japanese people became less reliant Japanese media agencies. In my opinion,
Japanese journalism should be open and transparent, and should report unbiased
facts. There are two main reasons for this. First, the Japanese media is closed
and unfair. Second, people have the right to know, so journalism must report
unbiased facts.
First, Japanese journalism is
famous for the “closed media” in the world.
There is the “Kisha
club” in Japanese journalism. Reporters without Borders, RWB, pointed out the
danger of the “Kisha club”. The “Kisha club” is a Japanese news gathering
association. They belong to national
papers or national televisionstations. They tend to write same articles, they
don’t have diversity. Freelance journalists can’t join this organization. Press
conferences in Japan are mostly sponsored by the “Kisha club”. Freelance journalists and foreign journalists
can’t attend press conferences sponsored by the “Kisha club”, so they can’t get
information from the press conferences. Some freelance journalists have claimed this is unfair. Japanese journalism
is homogeneous. It is not good for people. According to an article entitled, “EU acts to free Japanese media”on the Web site of newspaper, guardians, The European Union's warnings of mad
cow disease were not reported until the first case was revealed in September
2001. Also, EU is afraid of foreign journalists can’t join the press conference
in Japan. Many countries are worried about Japanese media and journalism.
Second, Japanese journalist should
report unbiased facts. In 2011, the big earthquake occurred in the east of
Japan. The nuclear electric power generation plant in Fukushima was destroyed, and
the meltdown happened. This was serious, Japanese people were in the dangerous
situation. At that time, the Japanese government and media didn’t talk about
and report the meltdown. Only one journalist reported that the meltdown happened. The foreign media said that meltdown may happen,
too. Only the Japanese media didn’t report about it. Finally, Japanese government
and media admitted the reality that meltdown happened after earthquake occurred
soon. According to an article entitled, “Meltdown happened 3.11,2011 on the Web
site of the Yomiuri Online, Tokyo Electric Power Company, TEPCO, guessed by the
data, meltdown happened 3.11,2011. Japanese people were tricked by the Japanese
government and media. Although, the aim of journalism is tell unbiased facts to
people, the Japanese journalism don’t do. Journalism is not the business, it is
justice.
To conclude, Japanese journalism
must change. Japanese journalism must be open and transparent. Freelance and
foreign journalists should be able to research and report as journalists in the
“Kisha club”. Japanese journalism must be a champion of justice.
・YOMIURI ONLINE, Meltdown happened
3.11,2011. Retrieved February 15,2013. From YOMIURI ONLINE Web site: http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/science/news/20110515-OYT1T00527.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments on my students' posts are most welcome. Please be advised that comments on this blog are moderated. Any abusive comments will not be approved. Also, anonymous comments will never be approved.